Revenue held against CAC
On the figures above revenue says the customer covers their acquisition 2,6 times; contribution says 1,4. The difference is the goods, parcels and fees revenue never subtracted.
Free calculator
What a customer is worth over a period you choose, in revenue and in contribution after goods, shipping and payment fees, set against what they cost to win and the month they pay it back.
Lifetime value in contribution, over 12 months
€76,13
LTV to CAC
1,4x
revenue says 2,6x
Orders per customer
1,70
over 12 months
Paid back
month 4
cumulative margin reaches CAC
One order
How customers come back
Observed from your own orders, not predicted: the share that ordered again and how often they did.
What a customer costs to win
↑ ↓ to nudge, Shift for ten. Commas or dots both work.
The first order repays 81% of the acquisition and the customer has paid back by month 4. Repeat orders are spread evenly across the period here; the LTV tab in nouz reads the real months from your own cohorts.
Revenue says €144,84. After goods, shipping and fees, 52,6% of it is margin, and that is the part that can repay the €55,00 the customer cost to win.
An estimate from flat rates. In nouz every order is priced from the costs of its own day.
A customer lifetime value calculator multiplies what one customer orders over a period by what each order is worth. This one gives both readings: revenue LTV, the figure most tools print, and contribution LTV after goods, shipping and payment fees, the part that can actually repay what the customer cost to win.
Why contribution
Most lifetime value calculators multiply an order value by how often a customer buys and stop there. That is a revenue figure, and set against acquisition cost it flatters every campaign that bought the customer, because the goods, the parcel and the payment fee come out of every one of those orders.
Contribution LTV takes them out first: each order counts with what it leaves after the goods, shipping and packing, and the payment fee, CM2 on a nouz statement. That is the only part of a customer’s spend that can repay what it cost to win them, so it is the one to hold against CAC.
Timing matters as much as the total. A customer who repays acquisition with the first order funds the store’s growth; one who repays it in the eleventh month has to be financed until then, which is why the calculator names the payback month as well as the ratio.
The LTV tab in nouz does this per cohort, customers grouped by the month of their first order, in revenue and in contribution, with the month blended CAC is paid back.
Where it goes wrong
Each one makes acquisition look cheaper than it is, which is the one direction an LTV figure must never err in.
On the figures above revenue says the customer covers their acquisition 2,6 times; contribution says 1,4. The difference is the goods, parcels and fees revenue never subtracted.
A customer who first bought last month has not had a year to come back. Averaging them into a twelve-month value drags it down; leaving out the slow-returning months drags it up. Count each customer only as far as they have been observed.
An open-ended lifetime multiplies today’s repeat rate by years nobody has observed. Value a fixed period you can check, such as twelve months, and extend it only as your own history does.
Attributed customers are claimed by more than one platform, which makes each platform’s cost per customer look lower than the store’s. Blended CAC, all ad spend over all new customers, cannot be shared out twice.
Worked example
The calculator’s starting customer: a €85,00 order without VAT, goods at 38%, a €6,40 parcel and 1,9% in fees, so each order leaves €44,68.
32% of new customers come back within 12 months for 2,2 more orders each, which is 1,70 orders per customer on average, and each one cost €55,00 to win.
Revenue says €145 a customer, 2,6 times what they cost. Contribution says €76, 1,4 times, and only that second figure pays for anything.
The first order covers 81% of the acquisition, so every new customer is financed until month 4, when the repeat orders have paid them back. Knowing that month is what lets a store decide how fast it can afford to grow.
In the app
A calculator works from flat rates you type once. nouz prices every single order from the cost rules that were in force on that order's own date, and rebuilds the same statement every night from your own orders and your own ad spend.

More calculators
Each one is a different question about the same statement. All 32 are free, and none of them asks you to sign up.
All calculatorsThe terms this calculator uses
The long version
Want the long version rather than the arithmetic?
Blended, one storeMER 3,94 · POAS 1,93the same spend, two questions7 min readMER, POAS or ROAS: which number should you steer onPlatform ROAS is the most reported and least reliable number in ecommerce. Two blended alternatives are harder to game and easier to trust.MER, POAS or ROASThe LTV tab in nouz follows each month's new customers in revenue and in contribution, with LTV by first product, first-order promotion and country, and the month blended CAC is paid back, all from your own orders.